December 07, 2009 Archives

2009-12-07 11:00:02

In Case You Were Wondering

Without the footnotes showing source links and most of the formatting, this is what the speaking notes looked like for the essay in LISTen 98:

INTEGRATE THIS

Late news this week should strike librarians with fear. In a complicated financial transaction, the whole question of net neutrality in the United States may well have been mooted. Comcast, known for not only being a cable broadband provider but also the owner of an entertainment group containing networks like G4 Television, has now bought a controlling stake in NBC Universal from GE. According to statistics released by MSNBC, a joint venture between NBC and Microsoft that Comcast now gains control over, properties like Universal movie studios, NBC News, MSNBC, Spanish-language network Telemundo, ten owned and operated broadcast television stations, Focus Features, iVillage, and the broadcasting rights in the United States for the Olympic games until 2012. A report by Greg Sandoval posted at CNET questions what may lay in the future for the Hulu joint venture that NBC is participating in. Reuters reports that the new company will be valued in the area of thirty billion dollars. Reuters reports that while GE retains a minority stake in NBC Universal, it can sell off that stake on or after 2016.

The original plan for this episode involved there being a chat between myself and Blake Carver over recent rumblings by News Corporation head Rupert Murdoch, incorrectly reported by at least one outlet to still be an Australian citizen as he has held US citizenship since 1985, and his drive to move the web away from being free as beer. Google responded to this with a new program to ensure their search tools could not be used to circumvent pay walls and/or registration requirements. The addition to the mix of the Comcast-NBC situation changes the stakes.

The net neutrality debate is now effectively over. When vertical integration is achieved at the level Comcast will gain if regulators approve, no law or mere regulation will prevent tiered access. Net neutrality was only possible if content producers and access providers were separate entities. With the intermingling of content production and access provision that Comcast would be able to undertake, it would seem that the current regulatory structures in place would be so insufficient to where outright legislation by the US Congress may be necessary. As an editorial aside, it should be noted that it is quite far from clear at this time that the Federal Communications Commission actually possesses sufficient statutory authority to impose net neutrality now.

Where do we go from here? In the long-term, this may present structural concerns for LISNews and allied portions of the media empire. If Walt Crawford could be talked into it, a hybrid print publication could be created to carry on the mission of Cites & Insights and LISNews. We've been trying over the past year to sell to NPR and foreign radio outlets material produced by the LISNews Netcast Network. If we could ever secure enough capital, LISTen could easily make its way on to the broadcast airwaves via shortwave as to do so market by market on the local level is beyond the amount of resources we could even dream of securing. With some changes to the post-production editing, Hyperlinked History could be picked up by PBS stations by way of the Independent Television Service ITVS. Old media techniques are most certainly not dead and with some creative work in creating fulfillment structures these sources could soldier on with the same material in different formats.

The LISNews world and allied forms of online expression have it easy compared to larger outlets. The various stars in this specialized constellation can benefit from somebody who has been considering this question for a little over twelve months. It would be interesting to see how production outlets like Revision3 and the TWiT network could survive in a world without net neutrality being in existence let alone enforceable.

Far more could be said. Indeed, an entire segment could exist talking about the flowchart posted by The Effing Librarian that seems to have rustled so many feathers and is getting linked heavily. The key thing to remember is that nothing is inevitable in the course of human events. To think that there is is to assume perfection in all human beings.

Until further word arises, this matter is in the air.


Posted by Stephen Michael Kellat | Permanent Link