May 2009 Archives
2009-05-13 10:49:11
On The Twitter Brouhaha
Tuesday was a unique day. As the 12th day of May
and its second Tuesday, I had appointments to keep within civil
society. While I was out and about interacting with other human
beings in-person, Twitter launched a change. Download Squad
reported that Twitter changed part of their core functioning.
UX specialist Whitney Hess
railed against the change. Gregory Pittman linked on
Twitter to a blog post
where Twitter explained that the change was due to engineering
limitations related to system stability.
This presents a core problem in the Twitter debates. Twitter may be
where people hang out. Is it structurally capable of handling the
load, though? Are there reasonable assurances of consistent system
behavior? Today's blog post dances around the problem of
scalability somewhat by relegating it to being the 800 pound
elephant in the room.
Twitter, at its core, is a fairly limited service. External
bolt-ons like TwitPic, Twibes, and more were created to make the
service do more than was ever intended originally. Re-tweets,
"Follow Friday", and other such things are more limited now which
practically prevents serendipitous discovery. Unless service was
contracted by a library with Twitter, there could be no guaranteed
service level which could potentially annoy patrons that might seek
help via Twitter.
Twitter is not the only game in town for microblogging, though. In
December 2008, LISTen talked
to Evan Prodomou who is a principal designer of the Laconica
software platform. Identi.ca is the
flagship site for the Laconica service while others like TWiT Army and Dungeon Twitter also exist.
Group functionality that Twibes provides Twitter is also integrated
into Laconica itself. Twitpic, Twitterfeed, and more can now
interact with Laconica-based sites just as easily as they can
interact with Twitter.
It seems a technically superior choice to Twitter exists. With the
weeping and gnashing of teeth observed Tuesday over changes in
functionality, the question is raised as to what constitutes the
bright line that has to be crossed before someone will switch
services. At the least, you can control your own local Laconica
installation far more readily than you can impact engineering
decision-making at Twitter. With federation possible through the
OpenMicroBlogging protocol, there is less of a need for the
monolithic microblogging platform than before.
The biggest question seems to be, though, what the next move is for
Twitter users.

On The Twitter Brouhaha by Stephen Michael Kellat is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at lisnews.org.
2009-05-12 00:19:59
Contingency Planning
One of the problems in podcasting is that it is
inherently more complicated than broadcasting. In broadcasting, you
create your program and then feed it to a transmitter. Radio waves
are generated by the transmitter which can then be picked up by a
receiver properly tuned and within appropriate reception range.
Podcasting definitely does not work that way. With such being files
of pre-recorded material traversing the Internet, there are many
potential points of failure. Podcasting is slightly more resistant
than streaming multimedia to failure but neither is as easily
understood by the consumer as broadcasts are.
To receive content, you should not have to be a specialist to
receive it. Turning on a transistor radio to tune in your local NPR
affiliate requires knowing how to turn a radio on, tune it to the
station you want, and set your volume appropriately. Podcasting
adds weightier layers of complexity when you have to have hardware
that can process the received file, have to know how to subscribe
to the feed, have to ensure that the files are in formats you can
actually use, and more. These are major barriers to be
surmounted.
Librarians face this conundrum every day. While librarians might
like patrons to understand the joyful intricacies of Library of
Congress Subject Headings or even Sears Subject Headings, that is
the creation of an expectation that users could become specialists.
The reference desk serves as the mediating layer that keeps the
peace and otherwise makes things work.
The biggest drive as of late is to help push LISNews Netcast
Network content over to radio. In case there are errors or
bottlenecks preventing people from accessing podcasts, alternative
access means would be appropriate. Whether it is low bandwidth
availability, filtering, throttling, or worse there are possible
cases where the Internet is not a wide open vista for some users.
This is partly why the LNN Experimental
Feed was inaugurated Sunday night to see if that could get
around some of those problems.
How can the network get on radio? That is tricky if you have no
money. The current kitty of funds for network operations is made up
more of moths than hard currency. That precludes us utilizing
"brokered airtime" arrangements at present.
The most viable step we can take is the Public Radio Exchange. This
is a way NPR affiliates can license content. This also allows the
network a tiny amount of revenue. Most pieces we have posted cost a
station five dollars to license. This is a competitive marketplace
for us to operate in but, according to the stats PRX has given us,
nobody knows we exist.
For those worried about any talk of money changing hands in this,
let me put your fears to rest. Trips to Cancun are not being
planned. The battery in the audio editing laptop bit the dust
Saturday after a hard life of three years. The non-smartphone PDA
that was used for cueing sound effects in the past may or may not
be brought back from the dead where it seems to be as I write.
Replacing the laptop battery alone is likely to cost around a
hundred dollars while the PDA cost will be between double to triple
the cost of the battery. Maintaining equipment is a larger priority
than junkets.
I wish I could do a whistlestop tour of the United States to
promote the network to station program directors. We do not have
the resources to fund that. We do have listeners who can help with
our outreach.
How can listeners help? Call your local NPR affiliate and ask for
the Program Director. If they have time, tell them about the
LISNews Netcast Network and how we can help serve a niche in your
community. If you get their voicemail, you could leave a message
like this: "Hi, I'm (insert name here) and I think you should check
out the L-I-S-News Netcast Network on Public Radio Exchange. In
today's knowledge economy, they have material that you might be
able to license for air. Check them out!"
Podcasts are normally resident on one server alone in being served
up to end-users. If that server flickers, there become problems
with distribution. Radio alternatives may help in the long run with
resilience. Amidst the winds of hope and change, utterances by
appointees leading the FCC and the FTC relative to Internet
regulation tend towards this being a prudent course of action to
start pursuing.

Contingency Planning by Stephen Michael
Kellat is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
2009-05-05 16:33:41
Thoughts - A Grab Bag Posting
Many things are going on so this is a
consolidated post. Reader discretion is encouraged.
I. The LISNews Netcast Network Operating
So far, so good operationally. We're providing audio content for
those who want it. We've been gaining non-librarian listeners for
Hyperlinked History and Tech for Techies. A beautiful
thing is when they outright tell me via Identi.ca that they're
subscribing.
Network content always needs to grow. Our main focus in terms of
content areas is to bring up matters with an applied focus. Pure
library science is fine but we already have LISTen: An
LISNews.org Podcast covering that somewhat. Some subject areas
that are desired to get applied programming on include as examples:
science in our lives, health science, transportation systems.
II. The Nature of the Network
Is the work of any network producer in creating programs an act of
librarianship? I would definitely say no to that proposition. In
the disciplinary spectrum, what the producers do is more
appropriately mass communication and/or journalism. There is not a
librarian way of podcasting or a nurse's way to podcast or a civil
engineer's way to podcast. In the end, it is an art of mass
communication.
III. The Network And The Public Radio Exchange
We've been trying hard to get pieces posted to Public Radio
Exchange. The problem is getting stations to buy what we produce. I
would love to have Hyperlinked History broadcast on National
Public Radio stations across the United States as part of a block
with Tech for Techies and highlights of LISTen. While
we can get ourselves in front of stations, listener demand is far
more important and useful. If you want to share the network with
people beyond your wired-in, cloudy community then contact your
local NPR affiliate today and ask their program director to pick us
up.
IV. The Network And Listeners Abroad
Quotes have been sought for how much it would cost to get network
programs relayed via shortwave to places abroad. For covering
Europe we have a viable option with one US shortwave broadcaster.
The cost of that will run about one hundred US dollars per month.
For the Pacific, we're not so lucky. The quote we just got for
relay coverage was for just under one hundred and ten US dollars
per week. For those abroad with bandwidth restrictions, such as in
Australia or New Zealand, this may be better in the long run in
terms of one's cost in listening.
This is still very much a work in progress. We do not have the
funds on-hand to approach this at this time. To reach European
listeners, we'll have to pay out at least USD$1,200 for airtime. To
reach listeners in the Pacific, we'll have to pay out USD$5,720 for
airtime. As for operating our own station, frankly we could not
afford the cost of that at all let alone secure the requisite
license from the Federal Communications Commission.
Why the worries about listeners outside the United States? In many
respects, there are apparently far more listeners outside the
United States than within it. We're not the only ones in this state
of affairs either, too.

Thoughts - A Grab Bag Posting by Stephen Michael Kellat is licensed
under a Creative
Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States
License.