Tuesday was a unique day. As the 12th day of May
and its second Tuesday, I had appointments to keep within civil
society. While I was out and about interacting with other human
beings in-person, Twitter launched a change. Download Squad
reported that Twitter changed part of their core functioning.
UX specialist Whitney Hess
railed against the change. Gregory Pittman linked on
Twitter to a blog post
where Twitter explained that the change was due to engineering
limitations related to system stability.
This presents a core problem in the Twitter debates. Twitter may be
where people hang out. Is it structurally capable of handling the
load, though? Are there reasonable assurances of consistent system
behavior? Today's blog post dances around the problem of
scalability somewhat by relegating it to being the 800 pound
elephant in the room.
Twitter, at its core, is a fairly limited service. External
bolt-ons like TwitPic, Twibes, and more were created to make the
service do more than was ever intended originally. Re-tweets,
"Follow Friday", and other such things are more limited now which
practically prevents serendipitous discovery. Unless service was
contracted by a library with Twitter, there could be no guaranteed
service level which could potentially annoy patrons that might seek
help via Twitter.
Twitter is not the only game in town for microblogging, though. In
December 2008, LISTen talked
to Evan Prodomou who is a principal designer of the Laconica
software platform. Identi.ca is the
flagship site for the Laconica service while others like TWiT Army and Dungeon Twitter also exist.
Group functionality that Twibes provides Twitter is also integrated
into Laconica itself. Twitpic, Twitterfeed, and more can now
interact with Laconica-based sites just as easily as they can
interact with Twitter.
It seems a technically superior choice to Twitter exists. With the
weeping and gnashing of teeth observed Tuesday over changes in
functionality, the question is raised as to what constitutes the
bright line that has to be crossed before someone will switch
services. At the least, you can control your own local Laconica
installation far more readily than you can impact engineering
decision-making at Twitter. With federation possible through the
OpenMicroBlogging protocol, there is less of a need for the
monolithic microblogging platform than before.
The biggest question seems to be, though, what the next move is for
Twitter users.
