One of the problems in podcasting is that it is
inherently more complicated than broadcasting. In broadcasting, you
create your program and then feed it to a transmitter. Radio waves
are generated by the transmitter which can then be picked up by a
receiver properly tuned and within appropriate reception range.
Podcasting definitely does not work that way. With such being files
of pre-recorded material traversing the Internet, there are many
potential points of failure. Podcasting is slightly more resistant
than streaming multimedia to failure but neither is as easily
understood by the consumer as broadcasts are.
To receive content, you should not have to be a specialist to
receive it. Turning on a transistor radio to tune in your local NPR
affiliate requires knowing how to turn a radio on, tune it to the
station you want, and set your volume appropriately. Podcasting
adds weightier layers of complexity when you have to have hardware
that can process the received file, have to know how to subscribe
to the feed, have to ensure that the files are in formats you can
actually use, and more. These are major barriers to be
surmounted.
Librarians face this conundrum every day. While librarians might
like patrons to understand the joyful intricacies of Library of
Congress Subject Headings or even Sears Subject Headings, that is
the creation of an expectation that users could become specialists.
The reference desk serves as the mediating layer that keeps the
peace and otherwise makes things work.
The biggest drive as of late is to help push LISNews Netcast
Network content over to radio. In case there are errors or
bottlenecks preventing people from accessing podcasts, alternative
access means would be appropriate. Whether it is low bandwidth
availability, filtering, throttling, or worse there are possible
cases where the Internet is not a wide open vista for some users.
This is partly why the LNN Experimental
Feed was inaugurated Sunday night to see if that could get
around some of those problems.
How can the network get on radio? That is tricky if you have no
money. The current kitty of funds for network operations is made up
more of moths than hard currency. That precludes us utilizing
"brokered airtime" arrangements at present.
The most viable step we can take is the Public Radio Exchange. This
is a way NPR affiliates can license content. This also allows the
network a tiny amount of revenue. Most pieces we have posted cost a
station five dollars to license. This is a competitive marketplace
for us to operate in but, according to the stats PRX has given us,
nobody knows we exist.
For those worried about any talk of money changing hands in this,
let me put your fears to rest. Trips to Cancun are not being
planned. The battery in the audio editing laptop bit the dust
Saturday after a hard life of three years. The non-smartphone PDA
that was used for cueing sound effects in the past may or may not
be brought back from the dead where it seems to be as I write.
Replacing the laptop battery alone is likely to cost around a
hundred dollars while the PDA cost will be between double to triple
the cost of the battery. Maintaining equipment is a larger priority
than junkets.
I wish I could do a whistlestop tour of the United States to
promote the network to station program directors. We do not have
the resources to fund that. We do have listeners who can help with
our outreach.
How can listeners help? Call your local NPR affiliate and ask for
the Program Director. If they have time, tell them about the
LISNews Netcast Network and how we can help serve a niche in your
community. If you get their voicemail, you could leave a message
like this: "Hi, I'm (insert name here) and I think you should check
out the L-I-S-News Netcast Network on Public Radio Exchange. In
today's knowledge economy, they have material that you might be
able to license for air. Check them out!"
Podcasts are normally resident on one server alone in being served
up to end-users. If that server flickers, there become problems
with distribution. Radio alternatives may help in the long run with
resilience. Amidst the winds of hope and change, utterances by
appointees leading the FCC and the FTC relative to Internet
regulation tend towards this being a prudent course of action to
start pursuing.

Contingency Planning by Stephen Michael
Kellat is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.